Applicative voice
| Transitivity and valency |
|---|
Transitivity |
Intransitive verb Transitive verb Ditransitive verb |
Valence increasing |
Causative Applicative Benefactive Dative shift |
Valence decreasing |
Passive Antipassive |
Reflexives and reciprocals |
Reflexive pronoun Reflexive verb Reciprocal (grammar) Reciprocal pronoun |
 Linguistics portal |
The applicative voice (abbreviated APL or APPL) is a grammatical voice that promotes an oblique argument of a verb to the (core) object argument, and indicates the oblique role within the meaning of the verb. When the applicative voice is applied to a verb, its valency may be increased by one. Many languages have dedicated morphology (commonly several affixes), for applicative uses. This is common in the world's languages, particularly in highly agglutinative languages, such as the Bantu languages, Nuxalk, Ubykh, and Ainu.
Contents
1 Behavior
2 Multiple applicatives
3 Similar processes
4 Examples
4.1 English
4.2 Swahili
4.3 Yagua
5 References
6 Sources
Behavior
Prototypically, applicatives apply to intransitive verbs.[1]:xxvii They can also be called "advancements" or "object promotion", because they bring a peripheral object to the center as a direct object. This object is sometimes called the applied object. For transitive verbs, the resulting verb can be ditransitive, or the original object is no longer expressed. If the original object is no longer expressed, it is not a valency-increasing operation[2]:186–7
Multiple applicatives
A language may have multiple applicatives, each corresponding to such different roles as comitative, locative, instrumental, and benefactive. Sometimes various applicatives will be expressed by the same morphological exponence, such as in the Bantu language Chewa, where the suffix -ir- forms both instrumental and locative applicatives. Some languages, such as Luganda, permit a 'second applicative' (known in Luganda as the "augmentative applied"), formed by a double application of the suffix. In this case the second applicative is used to give an alternative meaning.
Applicatives may also be the only way of expressing such roles, as in the Bantu Chaga languages, where instrumental, benefactive, malefactive, and locative are formed solely by applicatives. In other languages applicatives coexist with other methods of expressing said roles. In these languages applicatives are often used to bring a normally oblique argument into special focus, or as in Nez Percé, to keep humans as core arguments.
Similar processes
Applicatives have a degree of overlap with causatives, and in some languages the two are realized identically.[3] While differing from true applicatives, a similar construction known as dative shifting occurs in other languages, including English. Also, the benefactive case is commonly expressed by means of an applicative.
Examples
English
English does not have a dedicated applicative prefix or suffix. However, prepositions can be compounded with verbs for an applicative effect. For example, from
Jack ran faster than the giant,
the intransitive verb ran can be made transitive, and the oblique noun giant the object:
- Jack outran the giant.
The applicative verb can be made passive, something which is not possible with ran:
- The giant was outrun by Jack.
However, creating verbs with new meanings is not necessarily the same as applicative marking in languages like Chamorro.[4]
Swahili
Swahili has an applicative suffix -i or -e which appears before the last vowel of the verb. From andika 'to write', we get transitive
Aliandika barua 'he wrote a letter' (a-li-andik-a he-PST-write-IND)
and ditransitive
Aliniandikia barua 'he wrote me a letter', or 'he wrote a letter for me' (a-li-ni-andik-i-a he-PST-me-write-APL-IND).
Similarly, from soma 'to read',
Alinisomea barua 'he read me a letter', 'he read a letter to me'.
These are sometimes called 'prepositional' forms of the verb because they are translated into English using prepositions: cry for, pray for, eat with, enjoy (be happy about), arrive at, sing to, sell to, send to, open (the door) for, reckon with, see for (himself), die at. However, this name is inaccurate for Swahili, which doesn't use prepositions for such purposes.
Yagua
Yagua is one language that has dedicated morphology for applicative uses. Here, the applicative suffix -ta shows that the locative or instrumental oblique is now a direct object:[2]:187
sa-duu
3SG-blow
rá-viimú
INAN-into
sa-duu rá-viimú
3SG-blow INAN-into
"He blows into it." (valence = 1)
sa-duu-tá-ra
3SG-blow-APPL-INAN:OBJ
sa-duu-tá-ra
3SG-blow-APPL-INAN:OBJ
"He blows it." (valence = 2)
This same -ta suffix can be used with transitive verbs to create ditransitives:
sį-įchití-rya
3SG-poke-INAN:OBJ
javanu
meat
quiichi-tya
knife-INSTR
sį-įchití-rya javanu quiichi-tya
3SG-poke-INAN:OBJ meat knife-INSTR
"He poked the meat with the knife." (valence = 2)
sį-įchití-tya-ra
3SG-poke-APPL-INAN:OBJ
quiichiy
knife
sį-įchití-tya-ra quiichiy
3SG-poke-APPL-INAN:OBJ knife
"He poked something with the knife." (valence = 3)
These behave identically as other lexical ditransitives, such as give and send in this language.
References
^ Dixon, R.M.W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds) (1999). The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
^ ab Payne, Thomas E. (1997). Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 186–91.
^ Shibatani, Masayoshi & Prashant Pardeshi. (2002). "The causative continuum." In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 85-126.
^ (Grondona, 2016)
Sources
Aronoff, Mark; Kirsten Fudeman (2005). What is Morphology?. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN 0-631-20319-2..mw-parser-output cite.citation{font-style:inherit}.mw-parser-output q{quotes:"""""""'""'"}.mw-parser-output code.cs1-code{color:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-free a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-registration a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-subscription a{background:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration{color:#555}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration span{border-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help}.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-error{display:none;font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-error{font-size:100%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-format{font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-left{padding-left:0.2em}.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-right{padding-right:0.2em}
Mchombo, Sam (1998). "25: Chichewa". In Andrew Spencer and Arnold M. Zwicky. The Handbook of Morphology. Blackwell Publishers Ltd. ISBN 0-631-22694-X.
Mithun, Marianne (2001). The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-23228-7.
